Umpiring Errors Fuel West Indies Coach's Concerns in Australia Test; Social Media Erupts

Friday - 27/06/2025 00:55
Daren Sammy, West Indies cricket coach, expressed worry regarding TV umpire Adrian Holdstock's choices during the Test match against Australia. Sammy met Javagal Srinath, the match referee, to discuss his concerns. The West Indies team was troubled by Roston Chase and Shai Hope's dismissals. Sammy wants consistency in decision-making.

Daren Sammy, the West Indies cricket coach, has voiced his concerns regarding the decision-making of TV umpire Adrian Holdstock during the first Test against Australia. The controversy arose after several contentious reviews on the second day of play in Barbados.

Daren Sammy seeks clarity after contentious umpire decisions
West Indies complained of DRS mistakes by third umpire Adrian Holdstock during their first Test against Australia. (AP)

Sammy met with match referee Javagal Srinath to discuss his concerns, which he says originated from Holdstock's previous officiating during the ODI series in England.

Two specific decisions were particularly problematic for the West Indies team. The first involved captain Roston Chase's lbw dismissal off Pat Cummins. The team believed that replays showed evidence of an inside edge. The second controversial decision was Shai Hope's caught-behind dismissal off Beau Webster, where Alex Carey's catch was deemed clean after review.

"We are just trying to find some sort of understanding as to what the process is," Sammy stated. "We only hope for consistency. That's all we could ask for. When there is doubt in something, just be consistent across the board."

Sammy specifically highlighted his issues with Holdstock's umpiring. "I have noticed, especially with this particular umpire, it's something that for me started in England. It's frustrating. I just ask for consistency in the decision-making."

He further elaborated, "Yeah, look, you don't want to get yourself in a situation where you're wondering about certain umpires. Is there something against this team? But when you see decision after decision, then it raises the question. I know he's here for the series. You don't want to go in a Test match having that doubt."

Sammy emphasized the importance of trust in the umpires. "So I want to have that conversation as to the process… so we could be all clear. Because, at the end of the day, you don't want to be going into a Test match not trusting the umpires. And that's not what our team is about. So we're just looking for some clarity as to the decisions."

When asked about the possibility of filing a formal complaint, Sammy remained undecided. "You'll have to wait and see for that," he responded.

Social media reacts to umpiring decisions in WI vs AUS Test
An X user on the officiating in the West Indies vs Australia first Test.

Regarding Chase's dismissal, which occurred during a vital 67-run partnership with Hope, Sammy commented, "In our opinion, we saw the ball deviated onto the pad."

Sammy also drew comparisons between Hope's dismissal and Travis Head's reprieve from the previous day. "I'm just saying, judge what you see," Sammy said. "If you see the same thing and one is not out, there is even more doubt on the other one than you give it out. Again, I don't know what he's seen but from the images that we've seen, the decisions are not fair enough for both teams. We're all humans. Mistakes will be made. I just want fairness."

Australia also faced a controversial decision when their early morning lbw appeal against Chase was turned down. Mitchell Starc questioned the synchronisation between images and audio during the replays.

"There's been some interesting ones," Starc noted. "Obviously a couple more have gone against the West Indies than us. One for us [against Chase] looked like there was a gap between the bat and the ball, it cost us 40-odd runs, but then a contentious one to then get the wicket."

Umpiring decisions under scrutiny
An X user on the officiating in the West Indies vs Australia first Test.
Concerns raised over DRS technology
An X user on the officiating in the West Indies vs Australia first Test.

"As players, you can only ask a question. We don't use the technology to make that decision. It sort of felt like, or looked like, that the Snicko and the images were out of sync to some capacity."

Starc also mentioned that the Australian team felt Head's edge to Hope the previous day should have resulted in a dismissal.

Sammy acknowledged the potential repercussions of commenting on match officials and has advised his players against discussing the decisions publicly. "We know the rules. We know fines going all across the board," he said. "I don't want them to focus on that. Yes, we're kind of shooting ourselves in the foot by dropping so many catches, but look at the Test match, [us] against our own selves, some of these decisions, and we're still in a position to win."

Total notes of this article: 0 in 0 rating

Click on stars to rate this article

Newer articles

Older articles

You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second